And I would be remised one little political thing. I want to thank Hillary Clinton when she was Secretary of State for removing the MEK from the terrorist list. Now, that was going to happen because of the court, but she did the right thing when confronted with the fact and overcame the pro-Iranian in the State Department.
Secondly, I have not spoken out about how I feel this treaty or this agreement that may or may not come up, and I am not going to give a final verdict today. But there are some observations I would like to make about the negotiations. I am for negotiations even with your enemies, because you have to talk to your enemies because talking is better than war. But I am not for negotiations that give the mullahs $150 billion to spend spreading terrorism, not just to all the places that have been mentioned before, but for example, blowing up the Jewish center in Argentina and killing innocent people. They have spread terror all over the world, not just the Middle East, and we should not enable terrorism. And I guarantee you that the Revolutionary Guard will get their hands on a big piece of that $150 billion of sanctions and Americans will die as a result.
So we should under no circumstances end the sanctions until we are satisfied that the mullahs are keeping their word which they have never done in the past.
Secondly, we are not going to spend $150 billion enabling terrorist if we don’t get them to give up their capacity, which means that any agreement must completely eliminate the possibility of the mullahs possessing the atomic bomb, and any agreement must allow and complete and verifiable inspection in every facility contained in Iran, and if those conditions are not met, I cannot support an agreement.
We must not have an agreement for an agreement’s sake. A bad agreement does not contribute to anybody’s legacy. It makes their legacy worse. So I will be watching very carefully to see what happens in the next few weeks and the next few months. And I don’t know if I’ll support an agreement. But I will not support an agreement unless it eliminates the nuclear capacity for the mullahs, and I will not support an agreement unless there are guaranteed inspections. And anybody who does support such an agreement somehow believes that the negotiations are going to fundamentally transform the character of the mullahs. And while they are busy hanging publicly a thousand people a year, I do not think whatsoever that the character of the mullahs has been transformed.
Finally, I am going to conclude the way I started. I think all Americans of every party are proud of our country and proud of the role we have played in trying to increase human rights across the globe. And we have not always been perfect, but we have always believed that it was part of our mission as a nation to improve human rights for all people, including those who are not American. I would have liked it if our government had raised the issue of human rights with the mullahs, the second worse after the North Korea regime on the face of the Earth in the way they treat, murder and torture their own people. And we did not say a word. I do not know how America sleeps with itself if cannot stand up for everybody’s human rights. Human rights are not a matter of convenience. They must not be traded away to murderous regimes for any purpose.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire